Before I started writing, I read several articles by writers complaining about their own
perfectionism. One advised that when you were worrying about which word was
exactly right and whether a comma should go here or there then you were ready
to submit your manuscript. I was sceptical. If I ever got to that stage, I
thought, I really wouldn’t care about a comma here or there.
I’ve always resisted
proof reading. It is meticulous, which I am not. I’m much happier to have a go
and live with the consequences. All through school I rarely read my work through before
submitting it – much to the frustration of my teachers. Being critical so soon
after I had invested that much effort into something was dispiriting: I wanted to
tick it off the list, tell myself ‘well done’ and move on. Only after being a
teacher myself and experiencing the frustration of marking ‘almost there’ work
have I come round to the idea of proof reading. Now that I am trying to make a
career of writing I am forcing myself to do it.
Preparing Wild Rose
to be made into an EBook, I am reading the manuscript more closely than I ever have
before. It’s a new level of scrutiny. Now that I’m not reading for the story I
see errors all over the place: sentences starting without capital letters,
speech left lingering without closing speech marks, remnants of old characters
long deleted. Then there are those pesky commas – here, there or not at all? The
closer the manuscript gets to an audience outside my family, my agent or
someone I’ve paid for critique, the more paranoid I become about leaving errors
for critical eyes to find.
Which is just as well: there’s only so much perfectionism I
can muster and it’s almost entirely devoted to commas at the moment.
No comments:
Post a Comment